|
By most appearances, the year just
ended was a bad one for ''bling bling.'' A slang term that has made its
way from hip-hop culture to the mainstream, bling blinging is most easily
understood as flaunting that $1 million Piaget diamond-crusted watch.
It doesn't tell time any better than a plastic Casio; it does send a clear
message that the wearer has money to burn. The phrase was popularized
in a song by rappers from the Cash Money Millionaires stable that was
in part a catalog of obnoxiously flashy possessions (a private plane,
for example).
Of course, that song dates from 1999 the good old days, when rap
artists were hardly the only ones bingeing. Twenty-something stock tycoons,
Wall Streeters and various staid old white guys in charge of huge corporations
bling-blinged all through the 1990's, and nobody complained. That was
partly because they seemed to be fueling an economy that was good for
everybody and partly because so many people saw skyrocketing individual
wealth not so much as a problem but as something to get in on. It's only
natural that a couple of years of crashing stocks, rising unemployment
and corporate fraud and, of course, the wrenching personal reprioritization
that Sept. 11, 2001, inspired in many might turn us into a nation
of Thorstein Veblens, with little tolerance for such conspicuous consumption.
Evidence of an anti-bling mentality is all around. The neo-grunge, thrift-store
style of Avril Lavigne, for example, is shouldering aside the glittery
flash of Britney Spears on the radio and in retail outlets across America.
There is the form that the vogue for C.E.O.-bashing has taken: Dennis
Kozlowski ended up with the words ''Oink Oink'' over his picture on the
front of The New York Post not because people were upset with or
even understood what he is accused of doing wrong as the C.E.O.
of Tyco but rather because it came to be known that he owned a $15,000
umbrella stand. And in her latest hit song, even Jennifer Lopez seems
a little nervous. In what seems to be a stab at humility, she assures
that ''I love my life and my public'' and encourages us not to be ''fooled''
by her diamond life because deep down she's ''still Jenny from the block.''
But wait a minute. In the video for that song, Lopez positively revels
in the trappings of extreme wealth the diamonds, the limos, the
fur coats, the boats, the champagne. If J. Lo really thinks her public
might punish her for losing touch with ''the block,'' then why rub our
noses in her flagrantly bejeweled lifestyle on MTV? Her ''public'' doesn't
seem to mind, having pushed the slender tune near the top of the charts.
How does she get away with both sickening riches and humility? Dennis
Kozlowski, among others, would like to know.
The answer is that despite appearances to the contrary, deep down Americans
don't really have a problem with conspicuous consumption per se. It is
all in the packaging: we're O.K. with bling bling so long as we believe
it has been earned. Lopez makes for an interesting case study because
her public image is simultaneously middle of the road as the star
of the bland romantic comedy Maid in Manhattan and streetwise,
as a pop singer who collaborates with rap artists and borrows liberally
from hip-hop culture. It is the latter point that matters, because even
now hip-hop culture remains a safe haven for ridiculous expenditure.
Bling king Sean (P. Diddy) Combs, for instance, has lately been photographed
jet-skiing in his bathrobe on the French Riviera, and he has bragged about
his extensive list of demands (flowers, mirrors, tequila, multiple copies
of Scarface) for being the host of a music-awards show, and noted
that for prospective guests at a related party, "Manicures and pedicures
will be required, as will waxing and good hygiene." Snoop Dogg, styling
himself a kind of Hugh Hefner, has taken to drinking from a goblet covered
with rhinestones. Then there is Nelly, another rap artist selling millions.
If hip-hop was once ''the CNN of black America,'' as Chuck D memorably
put it, Nelly's new single is basically an infomercial. Titled ''Air Force
Ones,'' it is an ode to shopping for a style of $80-and-up Nike shoe
buying by the case when possible and includes what must be the
least impressive boast in the history of rap: ''Walk in the mall and they
know what I'm 'bout to say.'' The song is a smash and has sparked such
a run on the shoes that The Wall Street Journal says some Foot
Locker employees have been accused of ''scalping'' pairs at $200 a pop.
Fatigue among hip-hop fans with endless raps about Courvoisier, diamonds
and Cadillac Escalades is said to have played a role in the embrace of
Eminem's less-brand-oriented subject matter. But if some hip-hop fans
see flashy spending as worthy of condemnation, others clearly see it as
worthy of emulation.
''Using objects to make connections between people and establish one's
authority is an ancient and universal form of human behavior,'' Thomas
Hine argues in the recent book I Want That! How We All Became Shoppers.
He notes that those who possess ''key objects'' the crown, the
mantle, the Piaget watch ''have been the rulers and wizards of
their peoples.'' The subtext of the song ''Bling Bling'' was that the
Cash Money Millionaires had clawed their way out of a brutal New Orleans
housing project to become multiplatinum stars, and indeed some variation
on that is the theme of much hip-hop. Often it is not even articulated;
it goes without saying that the squandering protagonist is a rags-to-riches
figure who beat overwhelming odds and has every right to the fruits of
that success.
But the bad news for Dennis Kozlowski is that our tolerance for $15,000
umbrella-stand owners drops to zero if such ''key objects'' are not earned.
Like many a hip-hop star, Kozlowski rose from humble origins, too, and
according to his lawyers, he has done nothing wrong. But the overwhelming
consensus is that somehow or other he and his peers cheated their way
to wealth. So it is too late for Kozlowski to pose as Denny from the block.
Sure, Sean Combs was once accused of hitting a record executive with a
chair and a Champagne bottle, but at least he has never smacked your 401(k)
around.
This is why the new and supposedly humble incarnation of J. Lo
who once included a 45-foot trailer with white sofas, a VCR and green
seedless grapes as part of her specific demands for participating in a
charity project should be taken with a grain of salt. When she
sings ''I used to have a little, now I have a lot,'' what she is saying
is ''and therefore, I deserve it all.''

This
essay appeared in the January 19, 2002, issue of The New York Times
Magazine.

|