|
|
|
In my admittedly
limited experience, Carnival season has a sort of
deflationary effect on the news cycle in New Orleans.
In the weeks before and the days after Mardi Gras,
the stories covered by the newspapers and the evening
news are full of familiar features. We hear about
hotel occupancy rates, arrest statistics, and announcements
about celebrities participating in this or that parade.
There are profiles of this season's king and queen
of major krewes, Rex and Zulu , and assorted recaps
of local traditions. And once it's over and the cleanup
begins, there is a tally of how much trash was collected
the depressing barometer the city uses to gauge
the relative success of its biggest tourist attraction.
I had a feeling
this year would be different, though, when I received
an anonymous recorded phone call a few weeks ago attacking
one of the candidates in the city's upcoming mayoral
election. "Don't be fooled" by Ray Nagin a
Cox Communications cable executive whose mayoral candidacy
had just begun to surge the automated female voice
warned me. Despite his outsider talk, the voice continued,
Nagin is a tool of outgoing Mayor Marc Morial's "machine";
voters who want a break with the past would be well
advised not to support him. The recording didn't suggest
who a better candidate might be or give any indication
as to who funded this sneak attack. It just ended.
I hit *-69 and got a recording saying the call had
come from (000) 000-0000.
The Times-Picayune
subsequently reported that the mystery calls were
carefully targeted to white voters (Nagin, like most
of his mayoral competitors, is black). But the paper
never determined who was behind them. It was equally
hard to figure out which candidates were behind many
of the carefully targeted campaign mailings frequently
containing wild allegations of wrongdoing that marked
this year's election. In a city notorious for its
inefficiency, political opponents are nonetheless
smeared with dazzling precision.
Days after
I received my prerecorded call, Nagin was the surprise
top finisher in the first round of voting; last weekend
he won the runoff by a solid 59 to 41 margin. It was
a fascinating campaign for a relative New Orleans
newcomer like me. But even old-timers seemed surprised
by the race, which culminated in the town where the
good times roll and political practices are politely
described as "colorful" settling on a bona
fide businessman as its new leader. (The fact that
Nagin comes from the not-exactly-populist world of
cable is just icing on the King Cake.)
The consensus
among observers here is that the city is ready for
a change, and one can certainly see why that might
be. New Orleans has been losing jobs and population
for decades; what was once a financial center for
the South is today an economic backwater, a punch-line
city that's been described as having a business and
political culture more Caribbean than American. While
cities from Austin to Atlanta have developed whole
new economic sectors, here it's all about tourism,
oil, and the port, as it has been for years. So you
can see why New Orleanians might be ready for a change.
Don't get me wrong: I love living in New Orleans.
But if my livelihood depended on the local economy,
I'd have to move.
Perhaps the
most startling thing about the Nagin candidacy is
that his entire campaign lasted just about three months.
As recently as mid-January, he was registering about
5 percent in the polls, just another face in a field
of 15 candidates. Most of the top challengers were
political veterans, and the "outsider" vote
seemed to be coalescing around Richard Pennington,
the police chief. Though Pennington was the early
front-runner, he suffered from the perception that
he was secretly controlled by Morial exactly the
same charge later leveled against Nagin in that blind
phone call I received. It was an odd complaint given
that Morial is a popular two-term mayor who even now
enjoys sky-high approval ratings. Despite this, his
attempt to amend the city charter to run for a third
term was stomped by voters, whose general feeling
about him seems to be, "Marc did a great job,
and we want all traces of him removed from public
life." The strange upshot was that being endorsed
by the well-liked mayor was political anathema, and
Morial was duly invisible through the campaign.
Pennington
eventually this twisted logic to a new level. As Nagin
gained momentum, the police chief started criticizing
him for gaining too much support from influentials
who had previously been in Pennington's camp. "I'm
glad they're all with you now, because you're stuck
with them," he told Nagin in one of their debates.
This attempted jujitsu was of a piece with Pennington's
entire campaign. First came a radio ad, aimed at black
voters, suggesting that Nagin is a closet Republican
who supported George W. Bush and ought to be called
"Ray Reagan." (Pennington, like Nagin and
67 percent of the New Orleans population, is black.)
Weeks later Pennington was running ads prominently
featuring praise for his police work from the previously
demonized Bush.
Then there
were the smears, many of them like the phone call
I received mysterious in origin. On Lundi Gras, Pennington
held a news conference to announce that he had obtained
information "that sickens me to my core"
concerning Nagin's business practices, which he pronounced
"abusive, if not corrupt." It took two more
days before he made the more specific (if something
short of core-sickening) charge that millionaire Nagin
had tried to launch a car-rental business under a
program for "disadvantaged" minorities.
The mudslinging peaked days later when Pennington
accused Nagin of circulating an anonymous letter alleging
that the police chief was a wife beater. This sordid
turn drowned out the familiar post-Carnival news,
which found that though trash tonnage was up, hotel
business was "not as robust" as in the past.
And, as The Times-Picayune's social columnist enthused,
the Mistick Krewe of Comus ball a surreally anachronistic
masked affair that ends the season once again "served
as an apogee of Carnival tradition and excitement."
Watching all
this both the mayoral campaign and the Carnival backdrop it
was hard not to dwell on the cliché of New
Orleans as a city of masks. The election made it easy
to cook up conspiracy theories. Pennington's forked
relationship to Bush was just one example of a candidacy
that seemed like a study in masking an impression
driven home when he commented just over a week before
Election Day that, if he could start over, "I
probably would have a little bit more control of my
campaign." So who was controlling it? And what
about Nagin? Nothing "sickening" about his
business past emerged, but he did fudge facts about
whether he was a certified public accountant and whether
Morial had helped him to found a local minor-league
hockey team. Sure Nagin is charming and seems successful,
but what's behind the campaign mask? Was he really
in Morial's pocket after all? And who was behind that
allegation anyway?
But the most
interesting questions are about New Orleans itself.
True, the election seemed driven by a hunger for change.
And yet the general culture here seems proud and determined
to resist change. Mardi Gras is merely the most conspicuous
example both of an obsession with "tradition"
and of the city marketing itself as, above all else,
a unique party environment. The relentless focus on
tourism has amounted to New Orleans betting its future
on its skill in preserving its past. Can Nagin alter
that mindset? Does anybody really want him to?
A
similar version of this essay appeared in the March
18, 2002 edition of The New Republic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|